Debate: Satori by Flower Travellin' Band is metal |
Post Reply | Page 12> |
Author | ||
TheHeavyMetalCat
MMA Special Collaborator Black and Death Metal Teams Joined: 20 Nov 2015 Status: Offline Points: 1781 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: 10 Sep 2017 at 5:39am |
|
Just checked this album out on a recommendation. It was Japanese group Flower Travellin' Band's second album (first of original material). It came out in 1971 and for the time period I was quite surprised by how heavy it was, and to me seems to have characteristics of both heavy metal and doom metal. What do you think? We have it in hard rock here (agreed by RYM's heavy psych tag) but to me this band sounds like something more on the level with bands like Black Sabbath (who they covered on their first album), Budgie and Sir Lord Baltimore.
http://www.metalmusicarchives.com/album/flower-travellin-band/satori |
||
voila_la_scorie
MMA Special Collaborator Proto Team Joined: 18 Oct 2012 Location: Japan Status: Offline Points: 236 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
The first track is excellent early doom metal and very obviously inspired by Black Sabbath. It's actually quite unusual to find a song that intense and dark in those years. I don't recall tracks 2-4 so well but track 5 also has some great heavy stuff if I recall correctly. I bought this album two, maybe three years ago. I believe I wrote a review for it. I think it's proto-metal.
|
||
A story told that can't be real somehow must reflect the truth we feel.
|
||
Unitron
MMA Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: 30 Apr 2014 Location: Cypress Hill Status: Offline Points: 8051 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I had never heard of this band before, but I checked it out, and I would agree with you. While there's a lot of hard rock in the 70's that crosses into metal territory, this does sound like some serious Black Sabbath worship. Why am I not surprised that RYM doesn't know what they're talking about and doesn't have heavy metal or doom metal as at least secondary.
Edited by Unitron - 10 Sep 2017 at 3:49pm |
||
If I say fuck two more times that's forty-six fucks in this fucked up rhyme
|
||
666sharon666
Forum Admin Group Black, HM/HR/Glam Teams Joined: 29 Dec 2010 Status: Offline Points: 4086 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I'd need to have a full listen before acting but a quick sample suggests this needs moving on MMA. Actually, this seems like it may actually be more metal than Sir Lord Baltimore's debut, if memory serves.
This is their version of Black Sabbath from their previous album: |
||
Sisslith
MMA Special Collaborator Power & Neo, Prog/AG Teams Joined: 03 Sep 2016 Location: Spain Status: Offline Points: 1154 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Just streamed the whole album. For me, it's more heavy metal with doom metal elements than hard rock (though it's also there)... Many parts of the album do sound like early Black Sabbath. Maybe it should be tagged as traditional heavy metal, or at least proto-metal.
I can't say whether the heavy psych tag on RYM is appropriate since I haven't listened to many albums of the genre... Edited by Sisslith - 10 Sep 2017 at 2:32pm |
||
Only the dead have seen the end of war.
Without music, life would be a mistake. |
||
adg211288
Forum Admin Group Black Metal, Prog/AG Teams Joined: 05 Nov 2010 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 22311 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I can reasonably see this as heavy psych but I do have to agree. This is well in excess of the minimum metal requirements of MMA.
Loved the album too.
|
||
TheHeavyMetalCat
MMA Special Collaborator Black and Death Metal Teams Joined: 20 Nov 2015 Status: Offline Points: 1781 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
So I'm not thinking crazy then. Good to know. ;)
|
||
666sharon666
Forum Admin Group Black, HM/HR/Glam Teams Joined: 29 Dec 2010 Status: Offline Points: 4086 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
No, you're not thinking crazy. In fact unless someone can come up with a good reason not to I think I'm going to move this release into Heavy Metal.
|
||
Unitron
MMA Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: 30 Apr 2014 Location: Cypress Hill Status: Offline Points: 8051 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
So can the album be moved to heavy metal then? I don't see anyone disagreeing.
|
||
If I say fuck two more times that's forty-six fucks in this fucked up rhyme
|
||
666sharon666
Forum Admin Group Black, HM/HR/Glam Teams Joined: 29 Dec 2010 Status: Offline Points: 4086 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I'd really like to hear at least a couple more opinions first. To my ears it's pretty obviously a metal album, especially for an early 70's release, but this topic is still only a couple of days old at the moment, and there are still quite a few active or semi-active collabs who haven't posted here. They deserve a bit of time to do so, if they're going to. This isn't actually a case where the band/album is widely accepted into the early metal canon.
|
||
siLLy puPPy
MMA Special Collaborator Prog/AG Team Joined: 06 Oct 2013 Location: SF, CA, USA Status: Offline Points: 2742 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I own this album. I consider it heavy psych that is heavier than usual. I would probably vote for proto-metal myself since it's not really a metal album in the traditional sense
70s hard rock is most notably characterized by a bluesy shuffle with the decibalage cranked up. Satori is more of a psychedelic experience that happens to have heaviness. Even RYM lists this exclusively as heavy psych, however it doesn't really matter to me where it ultimately ends up
|
||
|
||
siLLy puPPy
MMA Special Collaborator Prog/AG Team Joined: 06 Oct 2013 Location: SF, CA, USA Status: Offline Points: 2742 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
One question i have always had is why a band like this would be considered metal when it uses slow distorted riffs but a much more energetic band like Van Halen which has monster riffing and blitzkrieg guitar solos is only considered hard rock. Seems illogical
|
||
|
||
Unitron
MMA Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: 30 Apr 2014 Location: Cypress Hill Status: Offline Points: 8051 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I consider some of Van Halen's stuff heavy metal, but that's besides the point. You can be as energetic as possible and have riffs and guitar solos, and that doesn't always make something metal. Metal is about technique and sound as much as it is heaviness. Think about it this way, what other genre of music uses slow, brooding, heavy, and distorted riffing all in one? The riffs on Satori are right out of the 70's Black Sabbath playbook. Would you call Black Sabbath heavy psych or proto-metal rather than Heavy Metal?
|
||
If I say fuck two more times that's forty-six fucks in this fucked up rhyme
|
||
TheHeavyMetalCat
MMA Special Collaborator Black and Death Metal Teams Joined: 20 Nov 2015 Status: Offline Points: 1781 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Yes but its not as if metal tags are being unanimously voted down on it either. It might be contested but there's still a strong support for this being a metal album there. Most of the comments (often a better source of the correct genre on such heavily debated albums) support heavy metal over heavy psych. Revolution666 hit the nail on the head regarding this vote:
|
||
TheHeavyMetalCat
MMA Special Collaborator Black and Death Metal Teams Joined: 20 Nov 2015 Status: Offline Points: 1781 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I'm also pretty sure that under site rules this can't be placed in Proto Metal if it's a fully fledged heavy psych album.
|
||
666sharon666
Forum Admin Group Black, HM/HR/Glam Teams Joined: 29 Dec 2010 Status: Offline Points: 4086 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
There are more than ten pages deserving to be in such a top 10 that's for sure. |
||
adg211288
Forum Admin Group Black Metal, Prog/AG Teams Joined: 05 Nov 2010 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 22311 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Correct, but this wasn't always the policy so there's probably a fair bit of hard rock still in proto that shouldn't be.
|
||
666sharon666
Forum Admin Group Black, HM/HR/Glam Teams Joined: 29 Dec 2010 Status: Offline Points: 4086 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Satori actually was in Proto until very recently but was moved when I went through the F entries in Hard Rock.
|
||
666sharon666
Forum Admin Group Black, HM/HR/Glam Teams Joined: 29 Dec 2010 Status: Offline Points: 4086 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I'd argue that a traditional sense for metal didn't exist in 1971. 70's heavy metal is actually a very small pool of artists unless you want to count groups like Led Zeppelin and Deep Purple who, while they may have been included in the fledgling heavy metal genre/scene then, are now widely considered 'just' hard rock bands. Until the mid to late 70's there are actually very few groups that have a Heavy Metal tag either on RYM or here on MMA itself. From RYM's charts: 1970: Black Sabbath - Paranoid Black Sabbath - Black Sabbath Sir Lord Baltimore - Kingdom Come 1971: Black Sabbath - Master of Reality Budgie - Budgie Bang - Bang 1972: Black Sabbath - Vol 4 Budgie - Squawk 1974: Budgie - In For the Kill 1975: Black Sabbath - Sabotage That's literally just four bands and ten albums and all of them considered part hard rock. That's nowhere near enough to consider the heavy metal sound standardised. '76 brings Judas Priest and Rainbow into the picture and this is our cut off year for Proto-Metal, so between them Rising and Sad Wings of Destiny could be seen as the first truly defining heavy metal albums, especially Sad Wings, which is the earliest heavy metal tagged album on RYM that doesn't have hard rock as a co-Primary. This paves way for further bands in '77 such as Riot, Motörhead and Quartz, whose self-titled is the earliest release typically included as part of the NWoBHM. Personally I can't help but wonder if that's a little too early, but that's another debate. Bearing this in mind, I don't think Satori should be judged by standards that only came to be years after its release. It needs to be judged as a contemporary of Black Sabbath, Budgie, Sir Lord Baltimore and Bang. It may not be in line with the popular view, but I do think this album warrants Flower Travellin' Band being considered a fifth true early heavy metal act on MMA. |
||
666sharon666
Forum Admin Group Black, HM/HR/Glam Teams Joined: 29 Dec 2010 Status: Offline Points: 4086 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I wouldn't say that Van Halen is considered only hard rock. Many of their albums have heavy metal recognised as a secondary on RYM. Think of them as a hard rock and heavy metal band, who lean more heavily on the hard rock side. |
||
Post Reply | Page 12> |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |