Printed From: MetalMusicArchives.com
Category: Site News, Newbies, Help and Improvements
Forum Name: Suggest new bands/artists to MMA
Forum Description: Suggest, create polls, and classify new bands you would like included on Metal Music Archives
URL: http://www.MetalMusicArchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=769 Printed Date: 22 Dec 2024 at 1:02am Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 10.16 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Topic: ZYWIOLAK for Folk-Metal?Posted By: Tuzvihar
Subject: ZYWIOLAK for Folk-Metal?
Date Posted: 10 Jul 2010 at 8:24am
ŻYWIOŁAK are a Polish band who should find their place here IMO. They are usually described as pagan folk-metal.
Official website: http://www.zywiolak.pl - http://www.zywiolak.pl .
PA entry: http://www.progarchives.com/artist.asp?id=4579 - http://www.progarchives.com/artist.asp?id=4579 .
I've got their album, Nowa Ex-Tradycja, and can provide it if needed.
Best regards, Bartek
-------------
Replies: Posted By: Raff
Date Posted: 10 Jul 2010 at 8:41am
Thanks, Bartek! I hope someone sees this and takes the band under their wing, so to speak.
Posted By: Time Signature
Date Posted: 12 Jul 2010 at 8:55am
I'll check them out ... since the Folk Metal team is very inactive these days.
-------------
Posted By: Time Signature
Date Posted: 12 Jul 2010 at 9:18am
I don't think any of their MySpace tracks sound like metal to me. Better wait for the folk metal team to return from whatever they're doing to check this out.
-------------
Posted By: Raff
Date Posted: 12 Jul 2010 at 9:50am
Is there still a Folk-Metal team here? If this is not the case, before we find some replacements (or additional members), we should probably rely on the judgment of those like Kim, who are willing to listen and evaluate any material at our disposal.
Posted By: Vehemency
Date Posted: 12 Jul 2010 at 10:29am
I guess there's no proper folk metal team, yeah. And I agree about that
any collab can freely take a listen and judge (if there's no
disagreements from anyone else).
I haven't listened to the band, but once again I provide my statistics
if they are of any use:
- the band is in Metal Archives ("psychedelic folk metal")
- the most popular tag in last.fm is "folk", then "folk metal"
Off-topic: I was planning that after I'm done with checking all the
black metal profiles I will browse all the folk metal ones.
Posted By: Tuzvihar
Date Posted: 13 Jul 2010 at 1:50pm
As I said, I've got their full album at my disposal. If you think the myspace tracks aren't sufficient I will gladly upload it for you. Maybe it'll be more convincing. Just tell me who I am supposed to send it to.
I do believe they should find a place here.
-------------
Posted By: micky
Date Posted: 13 Jul 2010 at 5:18pm
have often noticed ..after years doing it at PA's that you should never judge a band by the myspace tracks. They often are not reflective of a groups sound.. and our very often geared to being friendly on the ears.. or in some cases.. putting out a wide net to draw listeners in... ie.. highlighting more mainstream aspects of their sound. What is myspace anyway.. it's advertising.. first rule in advertising... get them interested.. then hit them with the real product.
Posted By: micky
Date Posted: 13 Jul 2010 at 5:24pm
in my humble two cents... in the absence of a team.. and remembering this is a site in the infant stages. I nominate Scott to be the judge. Tuz.. upload the album and send it to Scott.. if he thinks it belongs here. We'll add it. If Scott declines... I'll be the judge, jury, and executioner.
Posted By: Time Signature
Date Posted: 13 Jul 2010 at 5:48pm
There was Judge Dredd... now there's Judge Micky ;-)
-------------
Posted By: Tuzvihar
Date Posted: 14 Jul 2010 at 1:07pm
micky wrote:
in my humble two cents... in the absence of a team.. and remembering this is a site in the infant stages. I nominate Scott to be the judge. Tuz.. upload the album and send it to Scott.. if he thinks it belongs here. We'll add it. If Scott declines... I'll be the judge, jury, and executioner.
Ok. But... who is Scott?
-------------
Posted By: micky
Date Posted: 14 Jul 2010 at 6:10pm
Rushfan.. you know.. from PA's haha. Anyhow.. just send it to me and I'll screen it. You have me curious
Posted By: Tuzvihar
Date Posted: 15 Jul 2010 at 4:04pm
micky wrote:
Rushfan.. you know.. from PA's haha. Anyhow.. just send it to me and I'll screen it. You have me curious
Oh, I thought you meant someone else. I didn't recall Rushfan liking metal.
Anyhow... just ripping the album to my computer. And check this:
-------------
Posted By: micky
Date Posted: 15 Jul 2010 at 5:56pm
Tuzvihar wrote:
micky wrote:
Rushfan.. you know.. from PA's haha. Anyhow.. just send it to me and I'll screen it. You have me curious
Oh, I thought you meant someone else. I didn't recall Rushfan liking metal.
Anyhow... just ripping the album to my computer. And check this:
downloading now... and Scott? Hah.. how do you think has been the Judas Priest champion over at PA's Scott is metal FIEND! Yet another reason why I love the guy. Proggers bore me... I like people with broad horizons and tastes in music
Posted By: lucas
Date Posted: 15 Jul 2010 at 6:20pm
micky wrote:
Proggers bore me... I like people with broad horizons and tastes in music
Welcome to the club. Recently I expanded my musical horizon to reggae (that's the 20th or so musical genre I embrace, but not your usual Bobness, the obscure guys like the excellent keyboardist Jackie Mittoo or the even more obscure Cornell Campbell).
yes, proggers are boring.
Always trying to convince themselves that their music is the best (which is very far from being true) and even wanting to prove anyone else that other musical genres should be regarded as prog (Helloween, Stevie Wonder (!!!), Judas Priest, William Sheller). Why don't they call a cat a cat : Stevie Wonder = black music, Helloween = power metal, Judas Priest = heavy metal, William Sheller = chanson fran�aise...
------------- Dorosłe dzieci mają żal, za kiepski przepis na ten świat.
Posted By: Time Signature
Date Posted: 16 Jul 2010 at 3:14am
Well, true proggers should have broad horizons and tastes in music, given that prog itself is genre-defying, so I guess that the prog-elitists are not true proggers ;-)
-------------
Posted By: micky
Date Posted: 17 Jul 2010 at 7:20am
Time Signature wrote:
Well, true proggers should have broad horizons and tastes in music, given that prog itself is genre-defying, so I guess that the prog-elitists are not true proggers ;-)
proggers can actually be of some the most close-minded of musical listeners.
and that is an urban myth... prog has BECOME a genre all it's own.. no different from punk, country or reggae. We all know it. Prog today is often progby the numbers. Insert song length... some degree of complexity.. and some fruity lyrics and voila.. you have prog. The great stuff is the stuff that avoids the typical prog convention.. and is.. err.. progressive in it's approach to music.
However by doing do... some then can't see it as prog since it lacks....
Posted By: micky
Date Posted: 17 Jul 2010 at 7:22am
anyhow.. back on topic. Listening to this gem of an album this morning. Really liking what I'm hearing.
Posted By: micky
Date Posted: 17 Jul 2010 at 7:47am
hmmm.... going to listen to this a few more times before offering up an opinion.
To be bluntly honest... my first thought was a no for addition. You sure weren't bowled over by what you think of as 'metal'. However while listening, I read up on the group a bit and sort of got an understanding of what they are trying to do. Sort of goes back to what I posted earlier about prog by the numbers. Does it have to be complex and have 'whizling synths' ( � Raffaella 2006 ) to be prog. Does it have to be guitar based to be metal.
Looks like I'm hitting the books to learn about folk-metal. I'll be back to this group after some more reading and listening (including some other groups it appears).
Completely enjoyed the music though, whether 'metal' or not.
Posted By: Raff
Date Posted: 17 Jul 2010 at 8:21am
Since we happen to share the same living quarters , I listened to the album too. Excellent stuff, with the more folk-based parts reminding me of folk music from some areas of Italy. However, I didn't really detect a lot of metal in their compositions, except for one track that was patently riff-based. On the other hand, unlike other metal subgenres, folk-metal does not seem to be as cut-and-dried, and I believe we could do worse than let these guys in. Very interesting music indeed, and an incentive to explore the subgenre further.
Posted By: micky
Date Posted: 17 Jul 2010 at 9:15am
Raff wrote:
. On the other hand, unlike other metal subgenres, folk-metal does not seem to be as cut-and-dried, and I believe we could do worse than let these guys in. Very interesting music indeed, and an incentive to explore the subgenre further.
couldn't agree more
Posted By: Time Signature
Date Posted: 17 Jul 2010 at 1:56pm
I liked them too (well the tracks on MySpace), a lot, but it is not metal to my ears. I wouldn't protest if someone decided to include them though.
-------------
Posted By: micky
Date Posted: 17 Jul 2010 at 5:53pm
Time Signature wrote:
I liked them too (well the tracks on MySpace), a lot, but it is not metal to my ears. I wouldn't protest if someone decided to include them though.
not sure which of the tracks was on myspace.. but figure you did get a good sense of what they do sound like. Read a review of their on that metal site and pretty much sums things up. If I do add them, I'll do a review so people might have an idea it isn't exactly traditional metal
Reviews for Żywiołak's Nowa Ex-Tradycja
http://www.metal-archives.com/newreview.php?id=221061&PHPSESSID=8dcf2f0de05da666105f6223b77bc5da - Write
a review for this release.
Lacks the Metal Punch - 60%
Written by http://www.metal-archives.com/userprofile.php?user=MarburgVirus&PHPSESSID=8dcf2f0de05da666105f6223b77bc5da - MarburgVirus
on October 12th, 2009
Folk metal is an interesting metal subgenre in that it blends
two fundamentally different elements. (Mick: very true)There is the �folk� from the
traditional instruments (different depending on region) and the �metal�
that adds that necessary heaviness to the music to set it apart from an
average folk or world music album. In this regard, Zywiolak stays true
to its folk roots but does not succeed in the metal aspect.
If you read the �Current line-up� section of the band�s page, you will
see the plethora of folk instruments that the band uses to craft its
music. This is highly commendable and makes for an interesting sound.
However, the problem is that Zywiolak does not progress much past the
use of the folk instruments in its music. During almost every track on
the album, I found myself thinking, �Ok, the guitar break should be
coming up here any second�� Unfortunately, the metal is lacking in many
of the songs. There are guitars in some of the tracks, but they are so
far in the back that one can easily miss them. In fact, the closest
thing to folk metal (in the way that most of us are familiar with it) on
the album would have to be track 8, Oko Dybuka, due to its use of heavy
guitar, growly vocals, and folk instruments, but even then these three
are combined only at the end of the song.
I am not trying to say that this album is bad or that the band is
untalented. Rather, I am saying that this album is great from a purely
folk standpoint but sub par from a folk metal standpoint. Bottom line:
if you are a fan of folk metal, be prepared for this to sound completely
different from what you are used to. However, if you enjoy straight
folk albums like Finntroll�s Visor Om Slutet or Skyforger�s Zobena
Dziesma, then you will be more likely to find this album acceptable.
Posted By: Time Signature
Date Posted: 17 Jul 2010 at 6:27pm
As I said, no protests from me if they're added
-------------
Posted By: Raff
Date Posted: 17 Jul 2010 at 6:32pm
Kim, that's the kind of attitude everyone should have... Such a change from the never-ending 'what are X doing on here?' at PA.
Posted By: Time Signature
Date Posted: 17 Jul 2010 at 6:38pm
They actually remind me a little bit of a German medieval folk band called Tabula Rasa (but I think maybe they use similar percussion techniques (which in turn, first time I heard Tabula Rasa, remind me of rock music)).
-------------
Posted By: micky
Date Posted: 17 Jul 2010 at 6:50pm
actually the first thing I thought of... was Jacula. See metal for me is more than 'geetar'. It is a heaviness, a darkness (though perhaps w/o the occult overtones) which immediately made me thing of Jacula. Just without a dominant guitar in the sound, which is something of course Jacula had which is why some think of them as metal.. or a proto-metal if you look at the dateline.
Posted By: Time Signature
Date Posted: 18 Jul 2010 at 7:33am
Okay... I'm more conservative, I guess, since metal for me needs guitars, bass and drums to be metal :-)
And I thought I was the most liberal person om MMA ;-)
-------------
Posted By: micky
Date Posted: 18 Jul 2010 at 10:39am
Time Signature wrote:
Okay... I'm more conservative, I guess, since metal for me needs guitars, bass and drums to be metal :-)
And I thought I was the most liberal person om MMA ;-)
I took that chair when I moved in around here.
It's not difficult to surmise how I feel about evaluating bands; as my own proclivities are, uh, well-known and, uh,
often-lamented facts of PA's lore.
god I love Con Air.. that movie had great quotes coming from it's ears.
Posted By: micky
Date Posted: 18 Jul 2010 at 10:56am
In all seriousness....I've always been an open-tenter. Always thought the site was for the users, not the collabs, and if people think it is metal. I always thought it was our job to maintain a database, not be judge, jury, and executioner of popular tastes and standards. Granted metal is not as.. open-ended as prog is, but still. We saw early on with this site, there is still not iron-clad notion of what is metal and what is not. I didn't agree with some additions, but you know what... who cares! Others thought they were so what is the harm in adding them.
Anyhow... I'm going to add them unless someone strongly disagrees. With such a interesting mixture of metal and folk inherent in folk-metal.. there will obviously be various degress of 'metal' in it. This one might be on the lower scale of it, but that shouldn't preclude it from being listed on a site devoted to cataloging it. I'll wait a week and see if any of the collabs here have a real problem with it. If any do.. we'll talk it out and come to good solution.
Posted By: Tuzvihar
Date Posted: 18 Jul 2010 at 11:10am
Cheers Micky!
-------------
Posted By: Raff
Date Posted: 18 Jul 2010 at 11:14am
And remember that here - unlike on PA - we can delete an entry very easily. This band have only released an album so far. If their next is even less metal than this one, then we can think about removing them from the DB. However, if even the ultra-purist Encyclopedia Metallum has them, I don't believe adding them is going to do us any harm.
Posted By: micky
Date Posted: 18 Jul 2010 at 6:36pm
hahaha
Posted By: micky
Date Posted: 24 Jul 2010 at 9:23am
going once.. going twice
if no objections.. going to add ...
Posted By: micky
Date Posted: 24 Jul 2010 at 9:36am
tried to add.. but got a 'generic page error' upon submitting the group. Not sure what that is about
Posted By: Vehemency
Date Posted: 24 Jul 2010 at 9:54am
It is probably due to the special characters in the band name. I'm sure graphix / m@x will fix it.
Posted By: micky
Date Posted: 24 Jul 2010 at 10:08am
thanks!. I see I have two failed additions that show on the main page. If they could delete both of them.. I'll try it again without the special characters and see if that does the trick!
Posted By: micky
Date Posted: 24 Jul 2010 at 2:00pm
thanks to whoever cleaned my additions mess hahah.
Zywiolak added.. and Tuz... feel free to edit as you see fit.