MetalMusicArchives.com Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home >Site News, Newbies, Help and Improvements >Suggest new bands/artists to MMA
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Savatage
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedSavatage
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>
Poll Question: Where does Savatage belong?
Poll Choice Votes Poll Statistics
1 [12.50%]
7 [87.50%]
0 [0.00%]
This topic is closed, no new votes accepted

Author
Message
  Topic Search Topic Search  Topic Options Topic Options
NJCat_11 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 25 Mar 2010
Location: Denver, CO
Status: Offline
Points: 244 		Direct Link To This Post Topic: Savatage
    Posted: 27 Mar 2010 at 2:53pm
I was looking for Savatage for a review I'm planning on writing but, when I didn't see them under Progressive Metal, I checked Thrash Metal, and having seen no trace of them there either, proceded to look them up in the alphabetical S section. They are listed in Power Metal, which I think is very inaccurate.
Come and play me at Chess.com
Homepage
Back to Top
J-Man View Drop Down
MMA Special Collaborator
MMA Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: 25 Mar 2010
Location: Philadelphia,PA
Status: Offline
Points: 7032 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: 27 Mar 2010 at 4:38pm
I think they should be traditional heavy metal or progressive metal. Definitely not thrash, and probably not power metal.

Great, highly underrated band. Streets: A Rock Opera is one of my all time favorite albums!
Check out my YouTube channel! http://www.youtube.com/user/demiseoftime
Back to Top
NJCat_11 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 25 Mar 2010
Location: Denver, CO
Status: Offline
Points: 244 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: 27 Mar 2010 at 4:47pm
Originally posted by J-Man J-Man wrote:

I think they should be traditional heavy metal or progressive metal
I guess I could see them as a traditional heavy metal band too, but I think they fit much nicer in the Progressive Metal section.  It's also a precedent from your team at PA.
Come and play me at Chess.com
Homepage
Back to Top
J-Man View Drop Down
MMA Special Collaborator
MMA Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: 25 Mar 2010
Location: Philadelphia,PA
Status: Offline
Points: 7032 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: 28 Mar 2010 at 12:21pm
Originally posted by NJCat_11 NJCat_11 wrote:

Originally posted by J-Man J-Man wrote:

I think they should be traditional heavy metal or progressive metal
I guess I could see them as a traditional heavy metal band too, but I think they fit much nicer in the Progressive Metal section.  It's also a precedent from your team at PA.


That's true. But keep in mind, many of the listings are changed from PA on MMA.

I think that it would be a bit of a stretch to call Savatage full-blown prog metal, but they would fit much better there than in power metal. I would only consider a few Savatage albums as progressive metal,  but all of their albums fit in the heavy metal label.

-Jeff
Check out my YouTube channel! http://www.youtube.com/user/demiseoftime
Back to Top
NJCat_11 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 25 Mar 2010
Location: Denver, CO
Status: Offline
Points: 244 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: 28 Mar 2010 at 12:33pm
I guess you're the expert when it comes to Progressive Metal, so I'll leave the decision up to you.
In any case, they're not Power Metal.
 
My favorite album of their's is either Hall of the Mountain King or Gutter Ballet, can't decide.


Edited by NJCat_11 - 28 Mar 2010 at 12:34pm
Come and play me at Chess.com
Homepage
Back to Top
UMUR View Drop Down
MMA Special Collaborator
MMA Special Collaborator
Avatar
Errors & Omissions Team / Retired Admin

Joined: 25 Mar 2010
Location: Denmark
Status: Offline
Points: 18232 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: 28 Mar 2010 at 12:51pm
Well I always thought of Savatage as a US power metal/ heavy metal act so I actually think they fit very well in the power metal sub. As I understand the idea for MMA ( look at this thread: http://www.metalmusicarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=122) is that each album will be tagged. Which means that some Savatage albums will be tagged both progressive metal, Traditional Heavy Metal and Power metal while some might not have the progressive metal tag. Pretty interesting and quite different from the way PA works.
Forever TRUE - Forever BLUE!
UMUR on RYM
Back to Top
dean View Drop Down
Forum Groupie
Forum Groupie
Avatar

Joined: 26 Mar 2010
Location: albion
Status: Offline
Points: 40 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: 28 Mar 2010 at 12:56pm
Originally posted by J-Man J-Man wrote:

Originally posted by NJCat_11 NJCat_11 wrote:

Originally posted by J-Man J-Man wrote:

I think they should be traditional heavy metal or progressive metal
I guess I could see them as a traditional heavy metal band too, but I think they fit much nicer in the Progressive Metal section.  It's also a precedent from your team at PA.


That's true. But keep in mind, many of the listings are changed from PA on MMA.

I think that it would be a bit of a stretch to call Savatage full-blown prog metal, but they would fit much better there than in power metal. I would only consider a few Savatage albums as progressive metal,  but all of their albums fit in the heavy metal label.

-Jeff
I think once the album tagging gets off the ground this will sort itself out and we will be able to identify which albums were (Tampa) Bay Area Thrash/Speed Metal, which were Power Metal and which were Progressive Metal.
 
Being biased, I'd only identify "Fight For The Rock" as power metal TongueWink
Back to Top
NJCat_11 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 25 Mar 2010
Location: Denver, CO
Status: Offline
Points: 244 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: 28 Mar 2010 at 1:03pm
Originally posted by UMUR UMUR wrote:

Well I always thought of Savatage as a US power metal/ heavy metal act so I actually think they fit very well in the power metal sub. As I understand the idea for MMA ( look at this thread: http://www.metalmusicarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=122) is that each album will be tagged. Which means that some Savatage albums will be tagged both progressive metal, Traditional Heavy Metal and Power metal while some might not have the progressive metal tag. Pretty interesting and quite different from the way PA works.
 
I really hope this tagging system is going to be more organized than Last.FM
Come and play me at Chess.com
Homepage
Back to Top
m@x View Drop Down
Forum Admin Group
Forum Admin Group
Avatar
Co-founder, Admin & Webmaster

Joined: 25 Mar 2010
Location: Québec, Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 947 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: 13 Apr 2010 at 8:32pm
I moved them to PROG METAL.

Approve
Back to Top
m@x View Drop Down
Forum Admin Group
Forum Admin Group
Avatar
Co-founder, Admin & Webmaster

Joined: 25 Mar 2010
Location: Québec, Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 947 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: 13 Apr 2010 at 8:32pm
Some albums may be non-prog ?
Back to Top
The T 666 View Drop Down
MMA Special Collaborator
MMA Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: 30 Mar 2010
Location: Hell
Status: Offline
Points: 479 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: 13 Apr 2010 at 8:39pm
I have heard only two of their albums, which I have reviewed. Those are Hail of the Mountain King and Edge of Thorns. Both regarded as prog-metal by some people. 

As I say in my reviews, only power metal to me. Not that being prog-metal is better than being power metal. But definitely, it's not prog-metal at all. For me. 
Back to Top
m@x View Drop Down
Forum Admin Group
Forum Admin Group
Avatar
Co-founder, Admin & Webmaster

Joined: 25 Mar 2010
Location: Québec, Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 947 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: 13 Apr 2010 at 8:41pm
Oh.... I can move them back if the PROG METAL team dont want them ? 

Sorry , I thought it was clear and a mistake to have them 1st importer in POWER METAL.

Ouch
Back to Top
Stephen View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: 07 Apr 2010
Location: Indonesia
Status: Offline
Points: 352 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: 13 Apr 2010 at 9:46pm
either Trad Heavy Metal or Prog Metal should be fine, but maybe judging by their later release, Prog Metal should be more appropriate :)
Back to Top
1967/ 1976 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 08 Apr 2010
Location: Woman's heart
Status: Offline
Points: 302 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: 14 Apr 2010 at 2:53am
This one of the borderline bands between Prog, Power and Trad metal for me. One or another category is good, for me.
Back to Top
m@x View Drop Down
Forum Admin Group
Forum Admin Group
Avatar
Co-founder, Admin & Webmaster

Joined: 25 Mar 2010
Location: Québec, Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 947 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: 14 Apr 2010 at 5:18am
Is it possible that some of their early stuff is Trad. HM and later PROG METAL & POWER METAL ?
Back to Top
UMUR View Drop Down
MMA Special Collaborator
MMA Special Collaborator
Avatar
Errors & Omissions Team / Retired Admin

Joined: 25 Mar 2010
Location: Denmark
Status: Offline
Points: 18232 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: 14 Apr 2010 at 6:20am
^Exactly. The first two albums are traditional heavy metal IMO, I�m not too sure where I would put Fight for the Rock ( maybe traditional too) but both Mountain King and Gutter Ballet are usually called US power metal. I haven�t heard Streets but it�s sometimes refered to as progressive metal? I would tag both Edge of Thorns and Handful of Rain as US Power metal while Dead Winter Dead should probably be tagged progressive metal. I�m not familiar with The Wake and Poets and Madmen.
 
Savatage is not usually labelled progressive metal in metal communities and if you ask me they should probably be in prog-related more than in the full progressive metal catagory on PA ( hence some of the confusion here I�m sure). So I say most of their albums shouldn�t be tagged progressive metal here on MMA. Just my opinionSmile
Forever TRUE - Forever BLUE!
UMUR on RYM
Back to Top
m@x View Drop Down
Forum Admin Group
Forum Admin Group
Avatar
Co-founder, Admin & Webmaster

Joined: 25 Mar 2010
Location: Québec, Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 947 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: 14 Apr 2010 at 6:37am
Let's use the UMUR suggestions here and start with that.

Further discussions/reviews will help re-tag (if necessary)

Ok for you The T 666 ?

Need help doing that ?

Question
Back to Top
dean View Drop Down
Forum Groupie
Forum Groupie
Avatar

Joined: 26 Mar 2010
Location: albion
Status: Offline
Points: 40 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: 14 Apr 2010 at 6:48am
But... but... the three albums he hasn't heard Streets, The Wake of Magelan and Poets & Madmen are Prog Metal... Confused
Back to Top
m@x View Drop Down
Forum Admin Group
Forum Admin Group
Avatar
Co-founder, Admin & Webmaster

Joined: 25 Mar 2010
Location: Québec, Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 947 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: 14 Apr 2010 at 6:51am
Of course theses 3 are PROG METAL (and really good also)
 Rawks
Back to Top
UMUR View Drop Down
MMA Special Collaborator
MMA Special Collaborator
Avatar
Errors & Omissions Team / Retired Admin

Joined: 25 Mar 2010
Location: Denmark
Status: Offline
Points: 18232 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: 14 Apr 2010 at 7:36am
I think having them included in both traditional heavy metal, power metal and progressive metal ( which will happen if we tag them as suggested above) is valid and more importantly gives them exposure to fans of all three kinds of music.
Forever TRUE - Forever BLUE!
UMUR on RYM
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 10.16
Copyright ©2001-2013 Web Wiz Ltd.

This page was generated in 0.164 seconds.